Home arrow Blog arrow News arrow Control Systems Cyber Security - The Current Status of Cyber Security of Critical Infrastructures
Control Systems Cyber Security - The Current Status of Cyber Security of Critical Infrastructures | Print |
Written by Akiba   
Tuesday, 24 March 2009

[Akiba] This is a must-read. Everyone should hold on to their hats because as wireless sensor network deployment starts becoming a reality, there's going to be more of a focus on security issues. All of us in the industry will need to start becoming more knowledgeable in this field...uhhh...starting with myself...[/Akiba]

Testimony of Joseph M. Weiss Control Systems Cyber Security Expert before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation U.S. Senate

Good afternoon Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee. I would like to thank the Committee for your invitation to discuss the current status of cyber security of the control systems utilized in our nation’s critical infrastructure.

I am a nuclear engineer who has spent more than thirty years working in the commercial power industry designing, developing, implementing, and analyzing industrial instrumentation and control systems. I have performed cyber security vulnerability assessments of power plants, substations, electric utility control centers, and water systems. I am a member of many groups working to improve the reliability and availability of critical infrastructures and their control systems, including the North American Electric Reliability Council’s (NERC) Control Systems Security Working Group (CSSWG), the Instrumentation Systems and Automation Society (ISA) S99 Manufacturing and Control Systems Security Committee, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Industry-Grid Working Group, Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Power Engineering Society Substations Committee, International ElectroTechnical Commission (IEC) Technical Committee 57 Working Group 15, and Council on Large Electric Systems (CIGRÉ) Working Group D2.22- Treatment of Information Security for Electric Power Utilities (EPUs). I would like to state for the record that the views expressed in this testimony are mine.

Until 2000, my focus strictly was to design and develop control systems that were efficient, flexible, cost-effective, and remotely accessible, without concern for cyber security. At about that time, the idea of interconnecting control systems with other networked computing systems started to gain a foothold as a means to help lower costs and improve efficiency, by making available operations-related data for management “decision support.” Systems of all kinds that were not interconnected with others and thereby could not share information (“islands of automation”) became viewed as an outmoded philosophy. But at the same time, there was no corresponding appreciation for the cyber security risks created.  To a considerable extent, a lack of appreciation for the potential security pitfalls of highly interconnected systems is still prevalent today, as can be witnessed in many articles on new control systems and control system conferences. As such, the need for organizations to obtain information from operational control system networks to enable ancillary business objectives has often unknowingly led to increased cyber vulnerability of control system assets themselves.

The timing of this hearing is fortuitous as the Stimulus Bill has recently been approved which is stimulating work on the Smart Grid, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) cyber security standards are being updated, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) is being reviewed, and the water industry R&D Roadmap has been issued.  In each case, I believe there are shortcomings that can have significant impacts on the security of our critical infrastructures if they are not adequately addressed.

Link

Hits: 449
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

busy
  No Comments.

Discuss...
< Prev   Next >